1. Genesis
Of
PENHA has
responded to this crisis by developing Pastoralists poverty alleviation
programme’ funded by the Baring Foundation. The project’s activities began with PENHA and ICD
action-oriented research study on the
state of pastoralism in
The action research aimed to:
n Produce reliable information on which to base project
designs and their implementation;
n Promote a debate within
n Enhance the capacity of local community-based and
non-governmental organisations working with pastoralists at the grassroots
level.
The research generated reliable information upon which
the project designs and their implementation were based and culminated in the
presentation of the findings at two workshops: a National workshop in Burao in
December 2000 (in Somali) and an International workshop in Hargeisa in January
2001 (in English). The research and the two workshop recommendations formed the
basis for PENHA’s strategy for the development of the Baring Foundation funded
programmes. Follow up consultation exercises in 2001 with pastoralists communities
provided the basis for the development of actions needed for alleviating the
problems facing Somaliland Pastoralists. The consultation exercises provided
opportunity for Pastoralists to share concerns about the fact that no
organization was meeting their needs and asked for responsive action for
helping them deal with some of the perennial problems they face.
The results indicated that
nomadic pastoralism in
n Diminishing water resources caused by water run-off,
itself exacerbated by the removal of acacia trees for charcoal production;
n Environmental degradation, including severe erosion
caused by the water run-off;
n Enclosure of what was formerly rangeland with the
effect that common land was becoming unavailable for pasturage and the movement
of animals was being restricted;
n The ban on livestock import by Gulf countries under
the pretext of Rift Valley Fever caused difficulties throughout the region,
with the negative effect on
n Increased population pressure and a rapid process of
urbanisation driven by the prolonged civil conflict had significantly weakened
the institutions of pastoral society, to the degree that a generation of young
Somalis had little or no experience of pastoralism as a viable livelihood (and
equally little experience of any viable urban-based alternative);
n Poor livestock infrastructure, especially export and
veterinary facilities, once again a direct result of years of state failure and
an absence of formal regulatory or policy framework enabling pastoralists to
interact with the governments and people of neighbouring nations.
2. Programmes
Delivered.
Three year funding support
from the Baring Foundation has enabled PENHA Somaliland to deliver Pastoralists
poverty alleviation and environmental rehabilitation programmes with special
focus on:
·
Capacity-building
programmes (primarily training workshops) for pastoralists, local NGOs and CBOs
and relevant government ministries – most particularly the Ministry for
Pastoral Development and the Environment;
·
Lobbying and
networking on land tenure issues, rangeland policy and other policy issues that
affect pastoralists’ livelihoods;
·
Assistance for
the Somaliland Government in the development of appropriate policies relating
to issues of significance to pastoralists;
·
Environmental
protection and rehabilitation programmes, including the reintroduction,
management and improvement of grazing reserves including the Ban Awl reserve
·
Provision of
micro-credit to pastoralist women for recipients to be engaged in small
businesses to mitigate against pastoralists livelihood
problems and economic hardship brought by the ban imposed on
·
Facilitation of exchange
visits between
·
In 2004, PENHA in
collaboration of its partner agencies undertook relief work for
·
The Baring
Foundation grant also enabled PENHA Somaliland and the
Project’s Impact
The project’s activities were
conceived to produce medium to long term impact. However the evaluation report
recently submitted to the Baring Foundation provides information on some of the
short term impact of the 3 year activities. Examples include how the
environmental protection and rangeland Resource Management Techniques such as
the closure of grazing reserve and environmental rehabilitation works
undertaken including the construction of water harvesting contours is helping
to: